You can rest assured, including – and especially – among professionals, that our rational language is extremely organised. There are a lot of affairs between your single words away from a vocabulary and the meanings ones terms, respectively. Certainly one of linguists, these interactions are known as “semantic relations”, “feel connections” or “lexical interactions”. These types of semantic interactions should be analysed and discussed for the most part, plus in the second, one of them ones relationships are to be showed.
So you’re able to give a short, vital dysfunction of one’s high tech, it should be said that there are research projects about topic. However, this paper could only were many. Literary works that was utilized can be obtained around point half dozen, “List of Work Cited”. Project delimitations simply have been made in terms of outline is actually concerned. Since this report is only a highly brief little bit of lookup, the newest article writers features confined on their own never to enter into an excessive amount of detail, but rather make an effort https://datingranking.net/cs/mobifriends-recenze/ to provide an effective questionnaire of one’s point.
dos.step 1 Polysemy And you can Homonymy
Polysemy can be described as “an expression used in semantic analysis to mention to an effective lexical product which has a range of various other significance” (Amazingly 1997, 297). Crystal gives due to the fact analogy to possess polysemy brand new lexical item “plain”, that has the various significance “clear”, “unadorned”, “obvious”, an such like.(ibid. Crystal).
Today, the problem that arises to have linguists is how to separate polysemy out of a new ambiguity, away from homonymy. Amazingly defines homonymy as the “a term included in semantic data to refer to help you [a couple of] lexical items which [accidentally] have the same form, however, differ in meaning” (Crystal 1997, 185). Crystal’s examples listed here are “bear” and you may “ear”. “Bear” can establish a pet otherwise might have the definition from “to take”, “ear” is also make reference to one’s body or even corn (ibid. Crystal).
Within these instances, homonymy covers one another spoken and you may written variations, however it is and additionally possible that brand new label of several lexemes is actually one medium, in which case linguists carry out talk about limited homonymy or heteronymy (ibid. Crystal). One could separate two types of partial homonymy:
– Homography: a couple of lexical activities have a similar composed means, however, differ in the pronunciation (an illustration will be the two lexical items of “lead”, you to definitely pronounced [li:d] and definition “to settle side”, another noticable [led] and you will determining a different sort of kind of metal). – Homophony: one or two lexical situations have a similar pronunciation, but differ for the spelling
(e.g. the two lexical factors “led” and you will “lead”, each of which happen to be noticable [led], the initial as the earlier tense off “to lead”, the second again identifying another type of version of metal).
two types Of Ambiguity
Therefore, polysemy and you may homonymy should be well-known regarding one another by the existing or shed relatedness between your significance that’s allocated to just one phonological function. What is the key of your own matter, ‘s the question as to the the amount this concept off “relatedness” will likely be specified. In other words: how do “relatedness” be discussed? When the an obvious and you can real meaning would-be offered, the entire problem might possibly be set, for then the phenomenon out-of phonological forms whose relatedness are going to be turned-out would be entitled “homonymy”, whose relatedness can’t be turned out was named “polysemy”. not, as the happens many times in the field of semantics, one cannot simply bring an obvious and you can indisputable concept of the phrase “relatedness”. There are 2 first methods to this issue, one offered by historical semantics, additional by the synchronic semantics.
Historical semantics interprets the notion “relatedness” generally genetically hence talks from polysemy if the a good lexeme that have various other meanings contains the same etymological sources (Kastovsky 1982, 121). Instances try “game” towards the two significance “wildlife” and you will “playful craft” otherwise “funny” meaning both “strange” or “amusing”. Each other advice inform you lexemes whoever some other meanings have a similar etymological origins and so are hence translated since polysemy of the historic semantics.
